NHS Logo
Image from Google Jackets

Dolutegravir in clinical practice: UK experience within the named patient programme

By: Contributor(s): Publication details: 2015Uniform titles:
  • HIV Medicine
Online resources: Summary: <span style="font-size: 10pt;">Background: Dolutegravir (DTG) is a new integrase inhibitor (INI) with activity against raltegravir resistant virus. In 2011, a named patient programme (NPP) was initiated for patients with INI resistance or where DTG offered potential benefits over existing antiretrovirals. We report the UK experience of the NPP. Methods: Centres accessing DTG for HIV-1 infected patients within the NPP were invited to submit demographic, ART history, resistance, viral load (VL) and CD4 outcomes. Patients were analysed according to known presence (INI-R) or absence (INI-S) of INI mutations. Results: 34 patients were identified from 13 centres, 50% (17) with INI resistance. 5/17 INI-R vs 11/17 INI-S were male, median age was 46 vs 46 years, 8 vs 11 were of white ethnicity and 8 vs 8 were MSM. 3 vs 0 were known to be co-infected with HBV, and 1 vs 1 with HCV. Patients were generally highly ART experienced with significant resistance (see table). 9/17 vs 7/17 had high level resistance (Stanford HIVdb) to darunavir, etravirine or tenofovir. The most common major INI mutations were at positions 155 (n=8), 148 (4), and 140 (3). 5/17 had more than one major INI mutation, 3/5 had Q148 with >=2 secondary mutations from G140A/C/S, E138A/K/T, or L74I. At switch, 14/17 vs 11/17 had a known VL>1000c/ml, with median CD4 93 (range 1-1093) cells/mm</span><sup><span style="font-size: 10pt;">3</span></sup><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> vs 213 (2-490; p=0.90). Median number of additional ARVs in the optimised background regimen was 3 (range 1-6) for INI-R and 2.6 (1-5) for INI-S. For INI-R, VL<50c/ml in 5/9, 7/10 and 5/6 at 12, 24 and 48 weeks respectively, compared to 7/12, 5/7 and 2/3 in those with INI-S virus. In the INI-R group, after a median (range) of 71.1 (2.1-182.9) weeks FU, 10/13 had a final VL<50c/ml, and in the INI-S group, after 13.7 (2.7-62.1) weeks, 8/13 had VL<50c/ml. 4 patients in each group had no prospective FU. 2 stopped DTG after 61 and 166 weeks due to patient choice, and 2 died whilst taking DTG after 17 and 26 weeks. Conclusion: Early experience of DTG on the NNP in this highly treatment experienced group is mixed and likely influenced as much by patient adherence as regimen activity.&nbsp;(Conference abstract)</span>
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Home library Collection Class number Status Date due Barcode
UNKNOWN Ferriman information and Library Service (North Middlesex) Online Staff publications for NMDX Available

NMUH Staff Publications

EMBASE

16

&lt;span style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Background: Dolutegravir (DTG) is a new integrase inhibitor (INI) with activity against raltegravir resistant virus. In 2011, a named patient programme (NPP) was initiated for patients with INI resistance or where DTG offered potential benefits over existing antiretrovirals. We report the UK experience of the NPP. Methods: Centres accessing DTG for HIV-1 infected patients within the NPP were invited to submit demographic, ART history, resistance, viral load (VL) and CD4 outcomes. Patients were analysed according to known presence (INI-R) or absence (INI-S) of INI mutations. Results: 34 patients were identified from 13 centres, 50% (17) with INI resistance. 5/17 INI-R vs 11/17 INI-S were male, median age was 46 vs 46 years, 8 vs 11 were of white ethnicity and 8 vs 8 were MSM. 3 vs 0 were known to be co-infected with HBV, and 1 vs 1 with HCV. Patients were generally highly ART experienced with significant resistance (see table). 9/17 vs 7/17 had high level resistance (Stanford HIVdb) to darunavir, etravirine or tenofovir. The most common major INI mutations were at positions 155 (n=8), 148 (4), and 140 (3). 5/17 had more than one major INI mutation, 3/5 had Q148 with &amp;gt;=2 secondary mutations from G140A/C/S, E138A/K/T, or L74I. At switch, 14/17 vs 11/17 had a known VL&amp;gt;1000c/ml, with median CD4 93 (range 1-1093) cells/mm&lt;/span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt;3&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 10pt;"&gt; vs 213 (2-490; p=0.90). Median number of additional ARVs in the optimised background regimen was 3 (range 1-6) for INI-R and 2.6 (1-5) for INI-S. For INI-R, VL&amp;lt;50c/ml in 5/9, 7/10 and 5/6 at 12, 24 and 48 weeks respectively, compared to 7/12, 5/7 and 2/3 in those with INI-S virus. In the INI-R group, after a median (range) of 71.1 (2.1-182.9) weeks FU, 10/13 had a final VL&amp;lt;50c/ml, and in the INI-S group, after 13.7 (2.7-62.1) weeks, 8/13 had VL&amp;lt;50c/ml. 4 patients in each group had no prospective FU. 2 stopped DTG after 61 and 166 weeks due to patient choice, and 2 died whilst taking DTG after 17 and 26 weeks. Conclusion: Early experience of DTG on the NNP in this highly treatment experienced group is mixed and likely influenced as much by patient adherence as regimen activity.&amp;nbsp;(Conference abstract)&lt;/span&gt;

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.
London Health Libraries Consortium Privacy notice and Membership terms and conditions