000 03356cam a2200205 4500
001 NMDX7195
008 120401t2005 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 _aHoffman, L.
240 _aInternational Journal of Fertility and Women's Medicine
245 _aThe value of saline salpingosonography as a surrogate test of tubal patency in low-resource settings
260 _c2005
500 _aNMUH Staff Publications
500 _a50
520 _a<h4 style="font-size: 13px; margin: 0px 0.25em 0px 0px; text-transform: uppercase; float: left; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">BACKGROUND:</span></h4><p style="margin: 0px 0px 0.5em; font-size: 1.04em; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Tubal factor, which accounts for 15-30% of infertility in all women, is common in developing countries with high rates of pelvic inflammatory disease but limited resources. It is possible to outline the fallopian tubes by injecting isotonic saline transcervically during transvaginal ultrasound scanning of the pelvis, and both color flow Doppler and 3-dimensional scanning modes have been employed to improve visualization of the tubes, with varying success.</span></p><h4 style="font-size: 13px; margin: 0px 0.25em 0px 0px; text-transform: uppercase; float: left; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">METHOD:</span></h4><p style="margin: 0px 0px 0.5em; font-size: 1.04em; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">We investigated the value of saline salpingosonography (SSG), using 2-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound scanning, as a screening test of tubal patency in 113 women by comparing SSG findings to those at HSG or laparoscopy.</span></p><h4 style="font-size: 13px; margin: 0px 0.25em 0px 0px; text-transform: uppercase; float: left; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">RESULTS:</span></h4><p style="margin: 0px 0px 0.5em; font-size: 1.04em; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">The findings at SSG correlated well with the results of HSG or laparoscopy, with an overall concordance of 82.5%. SSG was more accurate at diagnosing patent tubes than blocked tubes and was well tolerated. The results are, however, unreliable when it is difficult to inject the saline and when the patient experiences severe pain during the procedure.</span></p><h4 style="font-size: 13px; margin: 0px 0.25em 0px 0px; text-transform: uppercase; float: left; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">CONCLUSION:</span></h4><p style="margin: 0px 0px 0.5em; font-size: 1.04em; font-family: arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">SSG is a useful screening tool for investigating infertility, particularly in low-resource settings.</span></p>
700 _aChan, K.
700 _aSmith, B.
700 _aOkolo, S.
856 _uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16279507
856 _uhttp://ferriman.wufoo.com/forms/journal-article-request/
999 _c76181
_d76181